Week+-+4

Do you agree with McLuhan when states comics are an extension of photographic media? Why or why not?
 I agree that McLuhan states comics are an extensive of photographic media.Because comics are like few photos that put together and put conversation on it to express what the author or the message try to tell us. Also, compare to a real book (or other medias) comics havevery little information provided, most of the time, it's short and to the point wont explain as detail as a real book. Without the pictures, comics probably won't be as attractive to readers and probably won't even make sense, since each conversations are so short. The comics does not have the same amount of visual experience of action as the "hot" media, for example, films or TVs Comics maybe just an extension of photographic media, but there is more complicated theory than McLuhan claimed it to be.


